[Home]() / [News & Guides]() / Investigation Consumer investigation
# How Maple Lodge Farms’ Zabiha Halal chicken is slaughtered and certified
Maple Lodge Farms describes a line where Muslim workers say God’s name aloud and a rotating blade cuts each bird. Two organizations certify the chicken. One Canadian scholar inspected the line. Another reviewed the company’s description. They reached different conclusions about who performs the slaughter.
Latest dated source check: 1 November 2026. Read the [source notes]() for the scope and date of each reference.
By Halal Food Pass · November 1, 2026 · [Responses and updates]() []()
The CHFCA name is printed around the seal at the lower left of this 800 g box. Open Food Facts lists Calgary as a place of purchase. Photo uploaded June 7, 2024 by anonymous-s7co2zv64u, resized and converted to WebP. [Open Food Facts record]() · [CC BY-SA 3.0]().
## Article menu
[Open article menu]()[Close menu and read the summary]()
## Plain English summary
A green box of Zabiha Halal chicken nuggets carries the same brand name as fresh chicken and sliced chicken bologna. The certificates have different scopes. To find out how the chicken is slaughtered, you have to go beyond the name on the box. Maple Lodge Farms says it stuns the birds with gas before they reach the blade. [Company’s process]() · [Company’s FAQ]().
What is certified?The Canadian Halal Food Certifying Agency (CHFCA) names four facilities and covers Zabiha Halal products bearing its logo through December 31, 2026. The Halal Monitoring Organization (HMO) covers fresh and processed chicken under the brand through December 31, 2027, without naming plants. [See both certificates](). Why do two certifiers sign?CHFCA’s poultry rules and HMO’s published 2019 conditions both permit a rotating knife. A third organization, the Halal Monitoring Authority (HMA), requires the person saying God’s name to cut each bird by hand. [Compare the three standards and see HMA’s own report]() · [Certification fees]() · [The president’s franchise history](). Why do scholars disagree?After a plant visit, Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi concluded that the arrangements he checked met the Shi‘a rules he applied. Mufti Faisal al-Mahmudi, working from the company’s and certifier’s descriptions, questioned how one worker’s action could count as the slaughter of each successive bird. [Who starts the blade?]() · [Compare the religious views]() · [See the Maple Lodge rulings](). Whose ruling should I follow?If your practice requires a hand cut for each bird, the brand describes a different method. If you follow a ruling that permits mechanical slaughter under conditions, the questions are who operates the blade, when the prayer is said and whether the bird survives the stun. [What to do when scholars disagree](). What gas is used?Maple Lodge researchers described carbon dioxide (CO₂). The bird breathes it before the cut. The study measured signs of life, including a pulse, and did not test gas levels in the meat. [What CO₂ does to the bird and what matters when eating the chicken](). Do countries agree?Brunei’s halal standard requires a hand cut. Türkiye’s religious council accepts a machine cut if its conditions are met. Indonesia’s domestic slaughterhouse rule and halal certification guidance address the two methods differently. [Compare 11 Muslim-majority countries](). What else is made at these plants?Two chicken bologna wrappers, one Zabiha Halal and one Maple Lodge Farms Original, carry the same Brampton plant number, 285. The Berwick plant processed chicken and turkey. We found no public evidence of pork in Zabiha Halal chicken. The federal recalls we found concerned bacteria, bone fragments or undeclared pea protein. [See the plant records and recalls]() · [See the May family’s other businesses](). What is still unclear?The public documents give no current speed for each line, timed record of the invocation for an entire shift, or account of an outside inspector stopping a line. [What can be answered for a particular purchase?]()
**In the grocery aisle** · If the slaughter method matters to you, photograph the package and its lot number. Ask the certifier which method was used for that product. [Use the five buying checks]() · [Read the shopper FAQs]().
## Who owns Maple Lodge Farms, and is it Muslim-owned?
Zabiha Halal says the May family owns Maple Lodge Farms and describes the company as non-Muslim-owned. It identifies its halal relations manager, brand manager and the workers who recite at slaughter as Muslim. We could not independently verify the religious affiliation of Maple Lodge Farms’ current owners. The corporate filings document who controls the business. For consumers who look to Muslim oversight for assurance, the practical question is who can reject a batch. [Zabiha Halal’s FAQ]().
The active Ontario corporation is Maple Lodge Farms Ltd., number 1000743690, with a registry date of December 31, 2023. Older entries bear the same name. The company’s board-approved report describes a privately held business selling through retail and food service. Statistics Canada’s 2025 ownership directory identifies Maple Lodge Holding Corporation as holding 100% of the voting rights in Maple Lodge Farms Ltd. Bob May Family Holding Corporation and Jack May Family Holding Corporation each hold 50% of the parent’s voting rights. [Statistics Canada’s 2025 directory]() · [How voting rights are recorded]().
In January 2026 the company named Fred Marques CEO, Werner Barnard COO and Michael Burrows executive chair. We did not verify the full board, individual beneficial interests within the family or an independently appointed religious board inside the company. [Canada’s Business Registries]() · [2025 corporate report]() · [Leadership announcement]().
### What other businesses does the May family own?
The family’s poultry businesses reach back to the hatchery. Statistics Canada’s 2025 directory gives Maple Lodge Holding Corporation 100% of the voting rights in **Maple Lodge Hatcheries Ltd.** and **Maple Lodge Farms Catching Services Ltd.**, as well as in the processor, Maple Lodge Farms Ltd. Global Affairs Canada’s 2026 list places the hatchery in Beamsville, Ontario. The holding company also has a 50% voting interest in **Eden Valley Poultry Incorporated** in Nova Scotia. Eden Valley identifies United Poultry Producers Incorporated as its other shareholder. [Statistics Canada directory]() · [Federal hatchery list]() · [Eden Valley shareholders]().
In Brampton, Maple Lodge Farms operates **The Chicken Shop**, with a butcher counter, prepared foods and a restaurant. The city says the shop also features goods from more than 25 Ontario vendors and suppliers. A shop shelf tells you who sells a food. For evidence of who made it, look for the establishment number on the package. Maple Lodge Farms, Fresh From The Farm, ULTIMATE and Zabiha Halal are brands in the company catalogue. [City of Brampton]() · [Company brand catalogue]().
Outside food production, Statistics Canada classifies the parent holding company under real estate. Its directory also records a 50% voting interest in Saugeen Holdings (Carrick) Ltd. Ontario’s corporate record lists Saugeen as inactive following amalgamation. The available records do not identify a current operating business under that name or provide a full inventory of individual family members’ investments. [Ownership data, structure 1894]() · [Saugeen registry entry]().
### From the May farm to the green box
1. **1955 and 1990.** Jack and Bob May established the business in 1955. Maple Lodge dates its first halal line to 1990. The brand says community leaders wanted affordable foods such as sliced meats and hot dogs. [Company history]() · [Brand history]().
2. **June 2003.** A launch report quotes then-marketing manager Fred Marques describing competition and consumer research. It names ISNA Canada as certifier. The brand’s own history dates the green box launch to 2004, but the July 2003 report already describes green packaging, and the trademark filing claims use by June 2003. [Contemporary interviews]() · [Trademark filing]() · [Brand account]().
3. **2015-16.** In April 2015 company spokesperson Carol Gardin said one of three lines had received a new gas-stun system, with renovations planned for the other two. [Gardin’s contemporary account](). A certificate issued in December 2015 by the Islamic Food and Nutrition Council of Canada (IFANCC) covered Brampton and Mississauga until December 31, 2016. [Historical IFANCC certificate]().
4. **2018 and 2023.** Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi endorsed HMO’s announcement for production from October 1, 2018, and reaffirmed his position after another plant visit in 2023. [Rizvi’s signed statements]().
## Which Zabiha Halal products and plants do the certificates cover?
Maple Lodge Farms posts two signed certificates. Both start on January 1, 2026. CHFCA’s certificate runs through December 31, 2026 and applies to Zabiha Halal products bearing its logo. HMO certificate J-333 runs through December 31, 2027 and covers the brand’s fresh and processed chicken. It names no plants and does not cover beef. The brand separately says CHFCA supervises sites making its beef products. [Read the CHFCA certificate]() · [Read the HMO certificate]() · [Brand FAQ]().
### Who owns the brand, operates the plants and issues the marks?
**May family***→***Maple Lodge Farms Ltd.***→***Zabiha Halal brand**
- **May family → Maple Lodge Farms Ltd. → Zabiha Halal.** The May family holds the poultry company through Maple Lodge Holding Corporation, according to Statistics Canada’s 2025 directory. The federal trademark register names Maple Lodge Farms Ltd. as owner of the Zabiha Halal design. [Ownership statement]() · [CIPO registration]().
- **CHFCA → four establishments.** CFIA lists Maple Lodge Farms Ltd. at Brampton #285, Saint-François, New Brunswick, #248, and Mississauga #256, also listed as Puddy Bros. Eden Valley Poultry Incorporated operates Berwick, Nova Scotia, #150 and names United Poultry Producers Incorporated and Maple Lodge Holding Corporation as its shareholders. Statistics Canada lists Maple Lodge Holding Corporation with 50% of Eden Valley’s voting rights in 2025. [Brampton]() · [Saint-François]() · [Mississauga]() · [Berwick]() · [Eden Valley ownership]() · [Statistics Canada ownership directory]() · [Federal agriculture bulletin]() · [CHFCA scope]().
- **HMO → branded chicken.** The four-site list belongs to CHFCA. HMO’s public document does not assign products to a particular slaughter or packing site. [HMO scope]().
These connections show three different relationships. A certifier signs a document, a company owns a brand and a licensed operator runs a plant.
Maple Lodge describes Mississauga as a further-processing plant and distribution centre. A shopper can identify the company that finished a product and still need the lot record to learn where the bird was slaughtered. A separate CHFCA document named Grand River Foods in Cambridge as a processor of branded poultry until April 24, 2026. Its subsequent status was not verified. [Corporate report, section 2]() · [Historical Cambridge certificate]().
## What else is made in these factories? Is there evidence of cross-contamination?
**Several products can be traced to the same buildings.** Historical wrappers for Zabiha Halal Chicken Bologna and Maple Lodge Farms Original Chicken Bologna both show Brampton establishment **285**. Eden Valley reported processing chicken and turkey at its Berwick plant. We found no published inspection finding, recall or laboratory result documenting pork in Zabiha Halal chicken. Public records do not identify every product that ran on a particular machine before a particular lot. [Compare the two wrappers]() · [Eden Valley’s 2023 report]() · [Records checked]().
### What the records say about each factory
- **Brampton, Ontario · establishment 285.** Ontario’s October 2022 approval for 8301 Winston Churchill Boulevard describes poultry slaughter, portioning, curing, smoking and wiener production at that address. Photos contributed in 2019 and 2021 connect two 375 g chicken bolognas sold under different brands to that establishment. [Ontario approval]() · [CFIA establishment 285]() · [See both inspection marks]().
- **Berwick, Nova Scotia · establishment 150.** Eden Valley says it processed both chicken and turkey in its production facility in 2023. The building has a documented pork-processing history. Maple Leaf Foods agreed to sell its Berwick assets in 2011. Chicken Farmers of Canada reported in 2012 that the former pork plant had undergone an equipment overhaul and opened for poultry. We found no record of pork processing alongside Eden Valley’s halal chicken. [Operator’s report]() · [Seller’s announcement]() · [Conversion history, p. 3]() · [CFIA establishment 150]().
- **Mississauga, Ontario · establishment 256.** Ontario identifies Puddy Bros. as a secondary poultry processing facility. CFIA lists the operator as Maple Lodge Farms Ltd. and Puddy Bros. as its division. Its registration covers poultry cutting and processing. Neither record assigns a branded product to a particular line. [Ontario site record]() · [CFIA establishment 256]().
- **Saint-François, New Brunswick · establishment 248.** Nadeau dates its acquisition by Maple Lodge Farms to 1989. CFIA now lists Maple Lodge Farms Ltd. at the site for poultry slaughter, cutting and further processing. The register does not list individual products. [Nadeau’s history]() · [CFIA establishment 248]().
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency’s entries for these four establishments list no swine slaughter. An activity code describes what the plant is registered to do. It cannot identify every ingredient brought in or prove what touched a particular batch. [Compare the four CFIA records]().
### Two chicken bologna wrappers, one plant number
Look just above the small print at the bottom of each package. Both inspection marks carry a crown and the number **285**. That is stronger evidence for a shared establishment than the Brampton mailing address. The green and blue wrappers were photographed years apart. They do not identify the slicer, the shift, the slaughterhouse supplying the meat or the certification status of the blue pack. [CFIA guide to the inspection mark]().
[]()
**Zabiha Halal · 375 g**
UPC 067714003376. Photo contributed December 28, 2019. [Original photo]() · [Product record]().
[]()
**Maple Lodge Farms Original · 375 g**
UPC 067714000092. Photo contributed February 21, 2021. [Original photo]() · [Product record]().
Package photographs by kiliweb for Open Food Facts. Photos converted to lossless WebP. Each detail enlarges the inspection mark from the photograph above it. [CC BY-SA 3.0]().
### Has a regulator documented contamination?
We searched Canada’s recall database, including archived notices, for “Zabiha” and “Maple Lodge” on November 1, 2026. Three historical records named the brands. Each identifies a specific hazard. None reports pork or a mix-up between halal and non-certified chicken. A brand-name search can miss records filed under another name. [Search for Zabiha]() · [Search for Maple Lodge]().
- **2012 · bacteria in a beef supplier’s plant.** CFIA’s March 19 list puts Zabiha Halal Beef Burgers (907 g), Maple Lodge Farms Halal Beef Burgers (4.54 kg) and no name 12 Beef Burgers (1.36 kg) at New Food Classics, establishment 761 in Saskatoon. This is direct evidence of one factory producing several brands of beef burgers. CFIA found *E. coli* O157:H7 in samples from several production days. Its final report does not identify either halal-branded burger as a positive sample. The supplier stopped production in February 2012. [CFIA product list under establishment 761]() · [Closed federal investigation]().
- **2017 · possible bone fragments.** CFIA’s August 11 notice names both brands’ Big Original Chicken Frankfurters, 450 g, marked 2017.AU.27. One injury was reported across the recalled products. [CFIA notice and package photos]().
- **2022 · undeclared pea protein.** Both brands’ 450 g Original Chicken Wieners with best-before dates from June 30 through September 28, 2022, and five lots of Zabiha Halal Corn Dogs contained pea protein missing from the label. One reaction was reported. The notice does not say the protein got there through shared equipment. [CFIA’s July 21 notice, lot list and package photos]().
### How are halal and non-certified products kept apart?
Zabiha Halal says it uses codes to track halal meat, carries out random checks and separates groups of birds its certifiers reject. It does not publish the production schedule, equipment-cleaning record or certifier’s inspection log for a shopper’s lot. We asked Maple Lodge which operations share equipment and how it verifies separation and third-party supply. [Company’s explanation]() · [Request for comment]().
For a specific pack, the lot code and plant number are the starting point. A record of what ran on the line immediately before that lot, how workers cleaned it between runs, and who verified the changeover would answer the equipment question. A pork DNA test could address pork in the sample tested. It could not tell how a chicken was slaughtered. [CFIA on preventing cross-contamination]() · [Sources and limits of this finding]().
## Read the evidence on the certificates
The excerpts show the addresses, product wording and dates on the two certificates posted by Zabiha Halal. Each original includes the full text and signatures.
Signed certificate · CHFCA
### The four facilities on CHFCA’s certificate
CHFCA’s list includes the Mississauga further-processing facility. A plant on this list need not be where the bird was slaughtered. [Open the CHFCA original]().
Signed certificate · HMO
### A product category, without a plant list
HMO’s wording covers fresh and processed chicken. It gives no slaughter site for an individual package. [Open the HMO original]().
## Who starts the blade and who says Bismillah when it cuts?
In the company’s account, at least three Muslim employees work on a line, with a backup. They take turns saying the invocation aloud as each bird reaches the rotating blade. Its FAQ specifically says it has never used a CD or cassette to bless chickens at its facility. It describes a cut through the neck passages, jugular veins and carotid arteries, leaving the head attached. Staff check for unsuitable birds and monitor heartbeat, movement and blood flow. The company says it codes halal products separately and segregates a group if the certifier finds it fails the standard. [Brand process]() · [Slaughter and segregation FAQ]().
The company says each bird is blessed. Its public account gives no current line speed or timed observation of complete invocations against successive cuts. A company representative described a rate of 140 birds per minute per line in 2003. The available records do not say whether a pause in recitation stops the conveyor today or how often an inspector witnesses a restart. [2003 interview]() · [Current public description]().
### Does Maple Lodge publish who switches on the blade for each batch?
In a company letter reproduced in June 2023, Latif Mirza, then identified as Manager Halal Compliance and Community Support, wrote that “the blesser starts the processing line” while reciting God’s name. The letter describes several Muslim workers continuing the prayer during production and a backup slaughterer. Starting the processing line and switching on a separate blade motor are different actions. The letter does not say whether one switch controls both. [Read point 2 and the signature in the original letter]() · [Publication date and provenance]().
What happens when the worker saying the prayer takes a break? On a 2014 visit, Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi found that a relief worker took over the prayer while the machine kept running. The relief worker had not helped start it. In November 2018, Rizvi wrote that HMO had assured him the lead and relief workers now started the machine together. HMO’s archived 2019 rules say a relief worker who takes over the prayer must have participated in startup. In February 2023, Rizvi reaffirmed his assessment after another visit and spot checks. His account does not describe every restart. [Rizvi’s signed accounts of both visits]() · [HMO’s archived conditions]().
The brand’s current FAQ describes continuous slaughter and workers taking turns to recite as each bird reaches the blade. It does not say that a new batch or package lot triggers a fresh start. We asked Maple Lodge who starts and restarts the rotary blade and who says the prayer. A dated shift log could link a lot to the people responsible at startup and after any interruption, even if it identified workers only by role. [Current producer FAQ]() · [Request for comment]() · [Operator evidence and dates]().
### What can a heartbeat check tell us?
Four Maple Lodge employees tested a practical question in a 2022 peer-reviewed study. Could a pulse oximeter distinguish a bird that had been stunned from one that had already died? The researchers detected a pulse in all six stunned birds tested with the device. They did not leave the birds uncut to see whether they recovered. [Goncalves and colleagues, full study and disclosures]().
Published measurements · 2022
### Where the pulse oximeter detected a pulse
**Conscious birds****2 of 2****Stunned birds****6 of 6****Dead on arrival****0 of 5**
The researchers used the pulse oximeter on 13 of 18 birds. The sample is too small to estimate a plant-wide survival rate. [Goncalves and colleagues, methods and Table 2]().
## Who makes the cut by hand or by machine?
Hand slaughter
A slaughterer takes a knife to one bird. In HMA’s standard the person performing that cut invokes God for that bird. [HMA poultry criteria]().
Mechanical slaughter
One operator can start a blade that cuts a succession of birds. Scholars differ on whose intention and spoken invocation count for the next bird and what must happen on a restart. [IIFA’s ruling]() · [Al-Mahmudi’s reasoning]().
[Where can machine-cut chicken qualify as halal?]()
## What gas stuns the chickens, and what does it mean for the bird and the person eating it?
**Carbon dioxide (CO₂)** is the gas identified in a 2022 study by four Maple Lodge Farms employees. The birds spent about a minute in each of five chambers. The average concentration of CO₂ in the air rose from 13.6% in the first chamber to 72.2% in the last. Zabiha Halal confirms it uses gas stunning. Its public description gives no gas mixture or settings for each plant, and the study does not name the slaughter site. [Zabiha Halal’s process]() · [Goncalves and colleagues, study methods]().
### What does the bird experience?
As the bird breathes the gas, carbon dioxide builds up in its blood and it gradually loses consciousness. Before that happens, chickens can gasp or shake their heads. Poultry researchers have observed signs of airway irritation and breathlessness during this stage. How long a bird is exposed, and at what concentration, affects whether it could wake up if removed and left uncut or whether the gas itself kills it. Zabiha Halal describes its stun as painless. The 2022 Maple Lodge study measured signs of life and did not measure pain during the stun. [CFIA on gas concentration and exposure]() · [EFSA’s poultry welfare assessment]() · [Experimental study of broiler behaviour]() · [Producer’s account]().
### What does a heartbeat tell us about halal slaughter?
A pulse shows that blood was circulating when the researchers took the reading. CHFCA’s poultry standard requires a bird to be alive and either conscious or able to recover immediately before the cut. Establishing recovery would require observing what happens when a stunned bird is left uncut. A bird that dies from the gas before its throat is cut fails that requirement. [Pulse study, methods and Table 2]() · [CHFCA poultry control 2]() · [International Islamic Fiqh Academy ruling]().
Process diagram · read from left to right
1. **01 · Arrival**Check for transport deaths. Plants may identify and remove these birds before or after gas stunning.
2. **02 · Stun**Control gas exposure or electrical settings. Check unconsciousness and evidence of life separately.
3. **03 · Cut**A person makes a hand cut, or a bird reaches a rotary blade. Check the neck cut and any misses.
4. **04 · Bleed**Monitor blood loss and confirm death before scalding. Trace and segregate rejected birds.
Original explanatory diagram based on Canadian regulatory guidance. It shows the points where records matter. It does not depict any particular plant. [CFIA on gas stunning]() · [CFIA’s poultry slaughter guidance]().
### Does CO₂ stunning affect the safety or quality of the meat?
**Food safety.** The high CO₂ percentages describe the air that the live bird breathed. The Maple Lodge study did not measure gas in the fillet. We found no evidence that eating chicken stunned this way poses a CO₂ poisoning risk. Concentrated CO₂ is hazardous to *breathe*. For someone preparing raw chicken, the documented risks include *Salmonella* and *Campylobacter*. Keep raw juices away from ready-to-eat food and use a thermometer. Health Canada recommends 74°C (165°F) for chicken pieces, ground poultry and frozen raw breaded chicken, and 82°C (180°F) for a whole bird. [What the Maple Lodge study measured]() · [Canadian occupational guidance on CO₂]() · [Health Canada on handling poultry]() · [Canadian cooking temperatures]().
**Meat quality.** In a separate US study comparing gas and electrical stunning, breast fillets from gas-stunned chickens were initially lighter in colour and slightly more acidic at deboning. After 24 hours the researchers could no longer detect those differences. The amount of liquid the fillets lost was similar. The study measured neither flavour nor health effects in people. [Riggs and colleagues, 2023]() · [Sources for gas, welfare and consumption]().
## Who certifies the certifiers and who pays them?
### Why do CHFCA and HMO certify this chicken if HMA requires a hand cut?
The names are easy to confuse. The Halal Monitoring *Organization* signed the certificate for branded chicken. The Halal Monitoring *Authority* publishes a hand-cut standard and names Zabiha Halal in a comparison of supermarket poultry. Canadian law leaves each certifier to explain the religious standard behind its mark. [Zabiha Halal’s description]() · [Canadian labelling guidance]() · [Federal explanation]().
**Canadian Halal Food Certifying Agency (CHFCA).** Its poultry rules expressly allow a rotary knife. A bird must be alive and conscious or able to recover immediately before the cut. Trained Muslim operators say God’s name at the start and regularly during slaughter, and a Muslim worker uses a knife if the blade misses a proper cut. CHFCA calls for the invocation at each slaughter in its general guidance. Neither document says how staff verify the timing on a Maple Lodge shift. [CHFCA’s poultry controls 2-4]() · [General slaughter requirements]() · [Signed certificate]().
**Halal Monitoring Organization (HMO).** In its rules archived in 2019, the Muslim who starts the machine counts as the slaughterer and must continue reciting while the birds are cut. A worker taking over the prayer at a break must also have helped start the machine. That explains why starting the blade together mattered to Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi when he assessed Maple Lodge. HMO’s current certificate covers branded fresh and processed chicken. It gives no shift-by-shift account of who started the blade. [HMO’s archived machine-slaughter rules]() · [Rizvi’s account]() · [HMO certificate J-333]().
**Halal Monitoring Authority (HMA).** Under its poultry rules, the Muslim saying God’s name over each live bird must also make that cut by hand. HMA says the speed of the mechanical lines it observed prevented it from assuring the individual prayer and proper cut for each bird. Its FAQ leaves the plants unnamed. HMA can approve certain gas-stunning systems, so the rotary cut alone puts the process Maple Lodge describes outside its standard. [HMA’s poultry guidelines]() · [HMA’s explanation]().
[]()[]()
**What HMA published about Maple Lodge.** These two excerpts show one row across pages 4 and 5 of Imam Omar Subedar’s paper on fresh poultry sold by major retailers. The columns give the brand, producer, cut, stun and certifier. HMA’s comparison identifies a mechanical cut, controlled-atmosphere stunning (CAS) and CHFCA. The brand’s own current documents identify both CHFCA and HMO. [Original HMA paper, pp. 4-5]() · [See both current certificates]().
HMA’s published comparison records its assessment of the brand. We found no record of an application to HMA, a refusal or a withdrawal. Maple Lodge’s published materials do not explain why it chose two certifiers. [Sources for this comparison]().
| What to check | CHFCA | HMO | HMA |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Legal identity and founding | Canadian Halal Food Certifying Agency Inc., an Ontario business corporation, no. 2506271. Incorporated February 25, 2016. [Ontario registry result](). | Halal monitoring Organization Inc., federal no. 984839-8. Formed July 29, 2016 under the business corporations statute, continued as a federal not-for-profit October 16, 2018. [Federal record](). | A department of the Canadian Council of Muslim Theologians (CCMT), federal not-for-profit no. 423151-1. The council’s record begins April 1, 2004. CCMT established the program through a steering committee. [Federal record]() · [HMA history](). |
| Leadership and religious authority | President Nasir Hussain. CFO Mukhtar Khokhar. CHFCA assigns Shariah oversight to Imam Hoossen Auckbarallee. Its chart gives no individual founder or appointment dates. [Organization chart](). | Directors Alaaeddin Abou-El-Hassan and Amir Gheziali. The first is identified as HMO’s imam on its certificate. The records cited here identify neither a president nor the founders or their religious training. [Directors]() · [Issuer](). | The World Halal Council names Hafiz Faizan Ul-Haq as chairman and Mohseen Sidat in inspectorate scheduling. COO Shaykh Omar Subedar’s academy records his 2001 graduation from the seven-year Islamic studies program in Dewsbury, England. [Council entry]() · [Academy biography](). |
| Cut, invocation and stunning | Allows a rotary blade with a Muslim backup cutter. Its general rule calls for invoking God’s name at each slaughter. Its poultry controls specify recitation before starting and regularly during operation. [General rule]() · [Poultry rules](). | In 2019 HMO allowed a machine cut when Muslim personnel who started it recited continuously. Relief staff had to have taken part in starting it. The published certificate gives no more recent operating instructions. [Archived HMO rules](). | A Muslim must cut each bird by hand and invoke God individually. HMA allows controlled water-bath stunning and has accepted certain gas systems after assessment. [Rules §§2.4-2.7]() · [Gas policy](). |
| Inspection and controls | Describes facility and personnel audits. Its public description does not say whether an independent inspector attends every Maple Lodge shift or may stop the line. [Audit process](). | Its 2019 rules described downstream manual cuts, removal of ineligible birds and checks for signs of life on selected birds after stunning. We found no current shift record or policy assigning authority to stop the line. [Archived rules](). | Its application requires inspector access throughout halal slaughter and production. Tagged carcasses, supplier checks and segregated handling are part of its published program. [2024 abattoir terms]() · [Traceability](). |
| Who recognizes it? | CHFCA describes SMIIC training and accreditation. We found no accreditor-issued record specifying the award, scope or renewal date. [Issuer’s statement]() · [SMIIC’s explanation](). | Rizvi published a religious assessment. We could not locate a separate accreditation award with a scope and renewal date. [Signed statement](). | The Canadian Council of Imams’ accreditation department lists HMA as 0102 for manual slaughter. The listing does not give a renewal date. [Accreditor’s register](). |
| Fees and independence | Published policy calls for a yearly proposal reflecting the operation. Its public policy gives no client-specific invoice or price, auditor pay or share of revenue from Maple Lodge. [Fees FAQ](). | A 2019 contract form called for the applicant to pay an annual fee, with the amount left blank. HMO also invited donations. Maple Lodge’s payment and its share of HMO revenue could not be verified. [Archived contract]() · [Archived funding page](). | The current abattoir form lists $200 plus HST to apply and preliminary inspection expenses. A 2024 form also allowed a board-set deposit up to $3,000. Neither document gives a Maple Lodge payment. [2024 form]() · [Current abattoir application](). |
| Maple Lodge certificate | Four establishments. Issued January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026, for Zabiha Halal products bearing its logo. [Certificate](). | J-333 covers fresh and processed chicken products under the brand, January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2027. The page does not name facilities. [Certificate](). | HMA requires a hand cut. We found neither an HMA certificate for this chicken nor a record that HMA rejected a Maple Lodge application. [HMA’s explanation]() · [Brand disclosure](). |
### Who gave the certifiers religious authority?
CHFCA calls Nasir Hussain a trained auditor in two food-safety disciplines, hazard analysis (HACCP) and good manufacturing practice (GMP). It identifies Armaan Hussain as the director responsible for certification operations and client relations, and assigns religious guidance to Imam Auckbarallee. The imam and president both signed the 2026 certificate. The chart documents that division of work. It gives no training provider, scholarly diploma or rule deciding whose judgment prevails if someone wants a batch stopped. [CHFCA roles]() · [Signed certificate]().
CHFCA’s FAQ says it is trained and accredited by the Standards and Metrology Institute for Islamic Countries (SMIIC). SMIIC’s own guide gives national accreditation bodies the job of assessing certifiers against its standards. We could not locate a document from the awarding body that names CHFCA, the work covered and an expiry date. The Canadian Council of Imams, by contrast, lists HMA by name for manual slaughter. [CHFCA]() · [SMIIC]() · [Imams’ council directory]().
### What was Nasir Hussain’s role at Popeyes? Is there evidence of a conflict of interest?
**Nasir Hussain publicly described himself as a co-owner of an Ontario Popeyes franchise.** His biography lists a franchise presidency under 2009 and identifies him as a vice-president of Trillium Labels. A copy of the page was archived in 2016. His contact page and CHFCA’s records list the same Mississauga office unit and fax number. Trillium’s directory also names Hussain and Mukhtar Khokhar. CHFCA identifies Hussain as president and Khokhar as chief financial officer. The biography gives no restaurant address or legal company name. We could not verify how long he held the interest or whether he holds it today. [Hussain’s own biography]() · [2016 archived copy]() · [His contact page]() · [Trillium’s 2013 company page]() · [CHFCA leadership and office]().
**There is a documented link to a former Popeyes supplier.** Popeyes’ franchise disclosure identifies ADP Direct Poultry Ltd. as a former supplier to its Canadian system. In July 2024, while ADP was an approved supplier, the poultry processor’s own website described its Taber Road and Vansco Road plants as halal-certified and displayed the CHFCA mark. The page did not name the issuer for each plant or a customer whose poultry the mark covered. Court records place the end of ADP’s approved supplier status in December 2024. CFIA lists ADP as a trade name at Toronto establishment 396 on Taber Road. An earlier CHFCA listing there named two chicken cuts for **Nando’s**. The certificate Hussain and CHFCA’s lead auditor signed for segmented poultry at that plant ran from October 23, 2025 to October 22, 2026. These records identify no delivery to a Popeyes restaurant owned by Hussain. [Processor’s July 2024 page]() · [Franchisor disclosure, item 3, p. 13]() · [Court reasons, paragraphs 8-10]() · [CFIA plant record]() · [Earlier CHFCA product listing]() · [October 2025 certificate]().
**The Maple Lodge certificate identifies the producer and its products. It names no Popeyes restaurant.** None of the 85 entries returned by CHFCA’s public business directory on November 1, 2026 used the Popeyes name, although a franchise may trade through a numbered company. We found no record tying a financial interest of Hussain’s to a decision on his own outlet or on Maple Lodge. We asked CHFCA to confirm his franchise history, identify any overlap with clients or suppliers and explain its safeguards. [Maple Lodge certificate]() · [CHFCA directory]() · [Evidence and limits]() · [Request for comment]().
### How much did Maple Lodge Farms spend on halal certification?
**We could not verify a dollar amount paid to either CHFCA or HMO.** We reviewed Maple Lodge Farms Ltd.’s supply-chain reports for fiscal 2023, 2024 and 2025. None gives a halal-certification expense, an amount paid to either issuer, or a combined total for certification and audits. The latest report, approved by the board on May 26, 2026, covers the year ended December 27, 2025. The audits it describes concern labour and supplier practices. [2023 report]() · [2024 report]() · [2025 report]().
**What the certifiers say about billing.** The Canadian Halal Food Certifying Agency (CHFCA) says it gives each applicant a yearly proposal after assessing the number of products and the size and complexity of the operation. The Halal Monitoring Organization (HMO) posted a contract form in 2019 that called for the applicant company to pay an annual fee in Canadian dollars. The form leaves the amount blank and gives the company seven business days to pay an invoice. We found no completed agreement or payment record for Maple Lodge. [CHFCA’s pricing FAQ]() · [HMO’s archived contract form]().
[]()
**The blank on HMO’s form.** This excerpt shows where a price could be entered for a client. The blank tells us nothing about how much Maple Lodge paid. [Read the original archived form]().
**What would establish the amount?** A year-end payment summary naming the payer, certifier, fiscal year and amount paid, or invoices matched to payments. Separate lines for certification, inspections, travel and internal payroll would show which costs a total includes. We asked Maple Lodge and CHFCA who pays and how the fees are calculated. We also asked Maple Lodge to forward a fee question to HMO. [Reporting and reply status]() · [Records checked]().
HMA publishes prices for *its own* program. Its restaurant FAQ gives an average of $250 a month. Its abattoir application lists $200 plus HST to apply, plus preliminary inspection expenses. HMA is a different certifier from the two that signed the Zabiha Halal certificates. Neither figure can be used to calculate Maple Lodge’s spending. [HMA restaurant FAQ]() · [HMA abattoir application]() · [The two signed certificates]().
The practical test of independence is what happens when an inspector rejects saleable product. A decision log, a reporting line outside plant management and a written appeal route would show who can uphold the rejection. The materials reviewed did not establish those protections at Maple Lodge, disclose scholar compensation or provide a withdrawal history for either certificate. We found no documented instance of a payment changing a religious decision. The HMA logo terms allow it to suspend or withdraw logo permission. Its FAQ directs restaurant-claim complaints to CFIA. [Logo-use terms]() · [Complaint guidance](). Neither HMO nor HMA’s parent produced a match in the CRA charities search under its registered business number. Their federal records independently establish not-for-profit incorporation. [CRA charity search]() · [HMO]() · [HMA parent]().
The Muslim Consumer Council of Canada (MCC-CA) offers another comparison. It expressly excludes gas stunning for poultry and requires any accepted stun to be reversible. Indonesia’s BPJPH lists MCC-CA for several sectors, including slaughtering services, through October 5, 2030. This identifies the authority and scope of its recognition. Neither source records a Maple Lodge application or decision. [MCC-CA’s position]() · [Indonesian register]().
### Dates behind the three certifiers
- **2004-07.** CCMT dates its monitoring work to 2004. It applied for the HMA mark in 2005 and registered it in 2007. [HMA history]() · [CIPO]().
- **2016-18.** CHFCA incorporated in Ontario in February 2016. HMO incorporated federally in July 2016 and continued as a not-for-profit in October 2018. [Ontario entry]() · [HMO record]().
- **2019-26.** HMO published its machine-slaughter conditions by 2019. Nasir Hussain signed a different CHFCA client’s certificate as president by March 2025 and signed the 2026 Maple Lodge certificate. The signature dates establish his role at those times. [HMO archive]() · [March 2025 document]().
## Can Anyone Start a Halal Certification Agency in Canada?
**We found it mind-blowing that Canada’s domestic halal-labelling rule requires no formal Islamic training or religious affiliation to start a halal certification agency.** A business can act as the named certifier. This provision requires no independent third party, government accreditation, Islamic degree, imam, mufti or religious board. When the government adopted the rule, it explained that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) would neither set a religious standard nor “establish requirements for becoming a certifying body.” [Canada Gazette, explanation of the halal rule]() · [Food and Drug Regulations, B.01.050]().
What does that mean at the meat counter? If a package says “halal” or uses a symbol that gives that impression, it must carry the full name of the person or organization that certified the food. The same requirement applies when the claim appears in advertising or at the point of sale. The business making the claim must be able to back it up if CFIA asks. For a shopper who wants hand-slaughtered chicken, the name on a Maple Lodge package tells them whose standard to look up. The rule does not require the certifier to publish its slaughter standard, fee schedule or financial statements. A buyer who wants to know who held the knife or how the birds were stunned must look beyond the certifier’s name. [CFIA’s halal label guidance]() · [Safe Food for Canadians Act, s. 6]().
A federal not-for-profit corporation can charge for services and generate a surplus. It has members and cannot pay shareholders dividends. Registered charity status and tax exemption are separate questions. Exports can bring another set of requirements. For covered Canadian halal meat going to Malaysia, the Canadian export instructions specify a slaughterer authorised by an Islamic society recognised by the Malaysian authorities. [Corporations Canada’s not-for-profit guide]() · [Canadian export rules for Malaysia]().
### What if the label gives a false impression?
Canada’s food law reaches misleading impressions about how food was made. The Competition Bureau considers both the literal words and the overall impression when assessing materially misleading marketing. Ontario also prohibits false consumer representations, and the advertising industry’s code has its own accuracy and clarity rules. A consumer can give CFIA the front and back of the pack, the lot code, a receipt and the exact claim. Depending on the evidence and statute, CFIA can seek correction or take enforcement action. Deciding between two interpretations of Islamic law is a different task. [Safe Food for Canadians Act, s. 6]() · [Competition Bureau’s general-impression test]() · [Ontario consumer protections]() · [Canadian Code of Advertising Standards]() · [Report a food concern]() · [CFIA enforcement guidance]().
## Can non-Muslims own a halal meat company or sell halal meat?
A shareholder can own a poultry plant without touching a bird. A supermarket can sell sealed chicken without choosing the slaughterer. For a family deciding what to buy, two questions follow. Who performed the slaughter, and what reason does the family have to trust the account of it? A Hanafi ruling from Darul Iftaa Chicago explicitly distinguishes company ownership from the validity of slaughter. It permits reliance on a seller for facts such as who supplied the meat while asking consumers to establish what that supplier’s certificate means. [Darul Iftaa Chicago’s ruling]().
| Role | Religious question | Where interpretations differ |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Owner or investor | Who employed and supervised the people doing the work? | Non-Muslim ownership alone does not invalidate a compliant slaughter. Some scholars ask for independent assurance about the source. [Chicago ruling](). |
| Retailer or distributor | Can the meat be traced to a slaughter that meets the buyer’s standard? | In guidance for Muslims in the West, Ayatullah Ali al-Sistani distinguishes a shopkeeper who may have checked from a package claim that gives the buyer no certainty. [Sistani’s retail questions](). |
| Slaughterer | Who intentionally makes the cut? | The International Islamic Fiqh Academy (IIFA) accepts a qualified Muslim, Jew or Christian. Sistani requires a Muslim and excludes slaughter by a person of the Book as an obligatory precaution. [IIFA, section II]() · [Sistani, ruling 2611](). |
| Machine operator | Whose action does the blade carry out? | Sistani’s office accepts a Muslim operator repeating God’s name as the machine slaughters. Other scholars require a fresh act by the operator for each successive cut. [Sistani’s machine ruling]() · [Canadian Hanafi ruling](). |
| Religious supervisor | Who checks the operator, cut and response to errors? | A supervisor can verify compliance. Under rulings requiring the slaughterer’s own invocation, another person standing nearby cannot supply it on the slaughterer’s behalf. [Ruling 2611, condition 4](). |
## What does Islam traditionally require at slaughter?
The Qur’an prohibits carrion and blood, identifies animals killed by strangling or a blow, and makes an exception for animals reached in time for lawful slaughter. It permits the food of the People of the Book and instructs believers about mentioning God’s name. The verses supply the basis for asking whether a stunned bird was alive at the cut. They do not describe a rotary blade. Two reports in Sahih al-Bukhari connect slaughter with the flow of blood and describe permission to eat a sheep slaughtered while dying. Sahih Muslim records the instruction to sharpen the blade and spare the animal suffering. [Qur’an 5:3]() · [5:5]() · [6:118-121]() · [Bukhari 5503]() · [2304]() · [Muslim 1955a]().
*Tasmiyah* means mentioning God’s name, commonly by saying *Bismillah* (“in the name of God”). *Takbeer* means saying *Allahu akbar* (“God is greatest”). Anas reports the Prophet saying both. On ordinary slaughter, the Maliki jurist Ibn Rushd records that Malik and Abu Hanifa required the invocation when remembered and excused forgetfulness. Al-Shafi‘i considered it an emphatic prophetic practice, so omission alone did not invalidate the meat. Ibn Qudamah gives the deliberate-versus-forgotten distinction as the well-known Hanbali view and records alternatives. In Sistani’s Ja‘fari ruling, either expression suffices when said intentionally by the slaughterer, and forgetfulness is excused. [Bukhari 5565]() · [Ibn Rushd]() · [Ibn Qudamah]() · [Sistani]().
The cut itself also matters. Taqi Usmani’s comparative account gives Abu Hanifa’s minimum as any three of the four throat structures. A Maliki view specifies the windpipe and both neck veins. The Shafi‘i view requires the windpipe and gullet. Usmani records both this threshold and a four-structure requirement from Ahmad. Sistani requires all four channels to be severed and the normal amount of blood to drain. This is why a certifier’s instruction for detecting a shallow cut matters even when everyone agrees the slaughterer said the words. [Usmani’s comparison]() · [Sistani on the cut]() · [blood drainage]().
## How do Sunni, Shi‘a and Ibadi scholars view hand and machine slaughter?
A proper hand cut can meet the rulings discussed here. Within both Sunni and Twelver Shi‘a Islam, scholars disagree over whether a worker who starts a machine can count as the slaughterer for every bird that follows.
A conveyor can carry a chicken to a person who cuts its throat by hand. A different line carries the bird to a spinning blade. Both may be called “automated,” but a scholar can accept the first and reject the second. Once the blade makes the cut, two questions divide the rulings below. Which person counts as the slaughterer? When must that person say God’s name?
### Sunni views
Mufti Faisal al-Mahmudi, writing from a Hanafi perspective about Maple Lodge, distinguishes one human action that cuts several birds together from a blade that keeps cutting them one after another. He questions what act by the slaughterer begins each new cut. Toronto’s Mufti Yusuf Badat gives a different answer. He accepts a machine cut if, among other conditions, the same eligible operator invokes God at startup and for each bird. Because that is difficult on a fast line, he advises buying independently certified hand-cut chicken. [Al-Mahmudi’s signed ruling]() · [Badat’s machine-slaughter ruling]().
Egypt’s Ali Gomaa reaches a different conclusion about a Polish plant. He accepts an eligible operator turning on a blade, provided the animal survives any stunning and the blade kills it. On saying God’s name, he draws on the Shafi‘i view and one Hanbali opinion that the invocation is recommended. [Gomaa’s ruling on the Polish plant]().
A teaching guide from the Muslim Community Center of Greater Pittsburgh presents a Maliki interpretation allowing one invocation for an intended batch, with an eligible operator and a hand cut for birds the blade misses. Scholars at the Islamic Fiqh Academy in India illustrate how opinion can divide even in one room. Asked about the same push-button line, most delegates accepted only the first animal, some rejected even the first, and another group accepted the run. They agreed that a worker could invoke and hand-cut each living bird brought by conveyor. [Pittsburgh teaching notes, slide 22]() · [Indian academy proceedings, §§3.1-3.4]().
### Twelver Shi‘a (Ja‘fari) views
Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani distinguishes birds cut at the same instant from birds cut in sequence. One intended invocation can cover simultaneous cuts. As birds pass one after another, the responsible Muslim must repeat God’s name close enough to the cuts to cover each bird. His manual also asks how the line is loaded. If birds are hung before the machine starts, the starter invokes. If a worker attaches birds to a running machine that then cuts them, he assigns the invocation to the person attaching them. [Al-Sistani’s English answer, question 2]() · [Al-Sistani’s manual, rulings 1270-71 (Persian)]() · [Who counts as the slaughterer, ruling 1274 (Persian)]().
Grand Ayatollah Muhammad Saeed al-Hakeem also allows a machine to serve as a Muslim slaughterer’s tool. He rejects a continuously powered blade when the person no longer directly performs the cuts, even if someone is reciting. For Maple Lodge, the affirmative assessment in the record is Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi’s. He applied al-Sistani’s rulings and described a return visit in his statement dated February 6, 2023. [Al-Hakeem’s office, “Slaughtering Process”]() · [Rizvi’s signed accounts]().
### Zaydi and Ismaili Shi‘a sources
Yemeni Zaydi scholar Muhammad bin Abd Allah Awad al-Mu’ayyadi answered a question about an American machine line that played a recorded invocation. For the setup described, he permitted the chicken if the operator was Muslim and advised abstaining otherwise. In a separate answer he required the neck vessels to be cut and God’s name to be mentioned at slaughter. Neither answer explains a timing rule for each successive bird. [Zaydi fatwa 5399 (Arabic)]() · [Zaydi fatwa 30023 (Arabic)]().
A Dawoodi Bohra academy account advises readers to invoke God at slaughter and check where restaurant meat comes from. It does not address a rotary blade. We could not verify a public ruling on industrial poultry cutting from a Dawoodi Bohra or a Nizari Ismaili authority. A Twelver ruling cannot supply that missing answer for either community. [Dawoodi Bohra academy reflections, p. 16]() · [Aga Khan Development Network on the Ismaili Imamat]().
### Ibadi view
Oman’s Grand Mufti Ahmad bin Hamad al-Khalili was asked about a factory that lines up poultry, invokes God once over a circular knife and then cuts the birds. He requires an invocation at each bird’s slaughter. Naming God over the first bird cannot cover the ones that follow. His answer addresses the timing of the invocation and leaves open whether a different machine setup could meet that condition. [Al-Khalili’s published answer (Arabic)]().
[]()
**Al-Khalili’s answer in print.** This excerpt begins with his requirement to mention God’s name at each cut. The factory’s question appears immediately above it in the original. [Collected fatwas, vol. 5, printed p. 276 (scan)]() · [Oman College of Sharia Sciences catalogue]() · [Enlarge excerpt]().
**At the grocery store.** Zabiha Halal describes a rotating blade and live recitation. If you follow a hand-cut requirement, the brand has answered the knife question. If you follow a ruling that allows a machine, ask the certifier who started the blade or placed the birds on the running line, who said God’s name when the shift changed, and how workers checked that the birds survived stunning. [Zabiha Halal’s process]() · [What the company says workers do]() · [Sources for the religious comparison]().
## Who are the scholars behind these rulings?
When Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi and Mufti Faisal al-Mahmudi wrote about Maple Lodge, they were answering a question a shopper cannot settle by looking at the box. Who counts as the slaughterer when a blade keeps turning? Their training helps explain how they approached that question. Their signed accounts tell us what evidence each had.
### Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi
Born in India and raised in Tanzania, Rizvi studied at a Shi‘a seminary in Qum, Iran, from 1972 to 1982. He attended advanced classes in Islamic law and later earned a master’s in history from Simon Fraser University. After serving as an imam in Vancouver, he became resident scholar of Toronto’s Ja‘fari community in 1996. [Jaffari Community Centre]() · [Hawza Online faculty biography]() · [Simon Fraser University’s thesis record]().
In 2014 he saw a relief worker say God’s name while a machine someone else had started kept cutting. Applying Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani’s rules, he wanted the relief worker to help start the machine. His 2018 endorsement relied on HMO’s assurance that workers had made that change. In a statement dated February 6, 2023, he reported a return visit, spot checks along the line and conversations with Muslim supervisors. He affirmed the products met the Shi‘a legal requirements he had applied. [Rizvi’s signed accounts]().
### Mufti Faisal al-Mahmudi
Al-Mahmudi founded Darul Iftaa Canada, where he answers questions about Islamic law. His biography records six years of study at Madrasah In’aamiyyah in South Africa, covering Islamic law, Qur’an interpretation and reports of the Prophet’s words and actions. He then studied under Mufti Ebrahim Desai, completing two further years of *iftaa*, training to issue religious legal opinions, in 2012. Desai’s signed letter confirms he supervised that training and encouraged al-Mahmudi to set up a Canadian office. [Al-Mahmudi’s biography]() · [Desai’s signed letter (image)]() · [2012 graduation report, p. 3 (archived PDF)]().
His September 2013 opinion drew on published accounts. He said he could not monitor the slaughter himself and advised readers to avoid the chicken while questions remained. In 2023 he examined the producer’s and certifier’s descriptions. His Hanafi analysis asks which human action starts the cut for each successive bird. In May 2025 he and Mufti Mirza-Zain Baig clarified that they endorsed no brand then producing machine-slaughtered chicken. [Al-Mahmudi’s 2013 ruling]() · [2023 ruling and 2025 clarification]().
[]()
**Darul Iftaa’s 2012 graduation report.** The school lists him as Faisal bin Abdul Hameed and records his plan to open an office in Montreal. [Full report, page 3]() · [Enlarge excerpt]().
### Other scholars connected with Maple Lodge
Mufti Muhammad Taqi UsmaniUsmani completed advanced religious studies at Darul Uloom Karachi, earned a law degree at Karachi University and served on the Shariat Appellate Bench of Pakistan’s Supreme Court from 1982 to 2002. He visited Maple Lodge in December 1994 and objected to the timing of the recitation he observed. His account describes the line as it ran on that visit. [Usmani’s biography]() · [Usmani’s published account, printed pp. 194-95]().Shaykh Hasanayn Kassamali and Shaykh Jaffer H. JafferRizvi names both men as companions on the 2014 visit. Kassamali studied at Middle Eastern seminaries, earned a master’s in Islamic studies at the University of British Columbia and founded the Academy for Learning Islam. Jaffer graduated from a Damascus seminary in 2011, earned a master’s in Islamic education from the University of Winchester and served as assistant resident scholar to Rizvi. Rizvi signed the published account. [Academy for Learning Islam]() · [Jaffari Community Centre]() · [Rizvi’s signed accounts]().Mufti Faraz ibn AdamAl-Mahmudi’s 2013 answer names him as the scholar who checked it and agreed. Adam completed a six-year Islamic scholarship program and specialized in giving legal opinions in Durban, South Africa. [Al-Mahmudi’s 2013 ruling]() · [Amanah Advisors leadership profile]().Mufti Mirza-Zain BaigBaig graduated from Darul Uloom Canada’s Islamic scholarship program in 2019 and studied how to issue legal opinions under Ebrahim Desai in Durban. The seminary lists him in its 2021 graduating class. He checked al-Mahmudi’s 2023 ruling and co-signed the 2025 clarification. [Dar al-Ulum Montreal faculty biography]() · [Darul Iftaa’s 2021 class list, pp. 2-3 (archived PDF)]() · [2023 ruling and 2025 clarification]().[]()
**Darul Iftaa’s 2021 class list.** Entry 13 names Baig and identifies his earlier school in Canada. [Full report, page 3]() · [Enlarge excerpt]().
Dr. Mohammad Iqbal al-NadviThe Centre for Islamic Knowledge records his qualification in Islamic law from the Islamic University of Madinah and his master’s and doctorate in Shariah from Umm al-Qura University, specializing in jurisprudence. The Canadian Council of Imams lists him as chairman on its panel of Islamic jurists. Zabiha Halal names him as an endorser. We could not verify a dated statement from him identifying the plant, line or procedure he assessed. [Centre for Islamic Knowledge]() · [Council of Imams panel]() · [Zabiha Halal’s FAQ]().
### Scholars whose rulings addressed a broader question
Grand Ayatollah Ali al-SistaniAl-Sistani studied and taught Shi‘a jurisprudence in Najaf, Iraq. His office records that two senior jurists separately recognized his qualification to derive religious rulings in 1960. His published answers explain when machine slaughter is permissible. Rizvi is the scholar who applied that guidance at Maple Lodge. [Sistani’s official biography]() · [Sistani’s slaughter rulings]() · [Rizvi’s signed accounts]().Dr. Ali GomaaGomaa earned a doctorate in the principles of Islamic law at Al-Azhar University in 1988, taught the subject there and served as Egypt’s grand mufti from 2003 to 2013. In 2005 he answered a question from Poland about stunning and machine slaughter. [International Islamic Fiqh Academy biography]() · [Egyptian ruling on the Polish question]().Mufti Ameen Shariff and Mufti Abrar MirzaShariff graduated from Madrasah In’aamiyyah in South Africa in 2023 and completed training in issuing legal opinions under Mirza in Elgin, Illinois, in 2026. Mirza, head mufti at Darul Iftaa Chicago, completed his own specialist training under Ebrahim Desai in 2009. Shariff wrote and Mirza approved the August 2026 ruling about buying meat in Egypt. [American Fiqh Academy member biographies]() · [Darul Iftaa Chicago faculty]() · [Signed ruling on Egypt]().Mufti Yusuf BadatAn imam at the Islamic Foundation of Toronto, Badat earned a master’s in Islamic sciences at Darul Uloom Zakariya in South Africa in 1998 and received authorization in jurisprudence from Darul Ilm in Birmingham. His ruling addresses machine-cut chicken generally. [Islamic Foundation of Toronto biography]() · [Badat’s machine-slaughter ruling]().Grand Ayatollah Muhammad Saeed al-HakeemThe Najaf scholar studied law and legal reasoning with his father and later attended advanced classes with senior jurists there. His office’s published answers give the test of direct human involvement quoted in this investigation. [Al-Hakeem’s biographical record]() · [Al-Hakeem’s office, “Slaughtering Process”]().Muhammad bin Abd Allah Awad al-Mu’ayyadiRaised in Dahyan, Yemen, he studied with Zaydi scholars and went on to teach and issue legal opinions. The Zaydi scholarly platform that publishes his biography also records his answers on American and Saudi poultry lines. [Al-Mu’ayyadi’s scholarly biography (Arabic)]() · [Zaydi fatwa 5399 (Arabic)]() · [Zaydi fatwa 30023 (Arabic)]().Sheikh Ahmad bin Hamad al-KhaliliAl-Khalili studied with scholars in Zanzibar and taught in Oman before his appointment as grand mufti in 1975. His collected fatwas give his answer about a circular poultry knife. [Fiqh Academy profile of al-Khalili, p. 10]() · [Collected fatwas, vol. 5, printed p. 276 (scan)]().
### The imams and religious officers at CHFCA, HMO and HMA
Imam Hoossen Auckbarallee · CHFCACHFCA identifies him as its director for Shariah oversight and says he trained in food-safety auditing. He signed the 2026 certificate, which spells his surname “Auckbaraullee.” We could verify his role and signature. We could not verify the institution or award behind his religious training or CHFCA’s use of the title “Dr.” [CHFCA’s leadership chart]() · [Signed CHFCA certificate]().Sayed Alaaeddin Abulhassan · HMORizvi identifies him as HMO’s religious supervisor in 2018 and as a companion on the later visit reported in 2023. HMO’s certificate names its signing imam as Syed Alaaddin Abou el Hassan. The federal register lists Alaaeddin Abou-El-Hassan as a director. We could not verify a seminary or religious qualification in his name. Rizvi identifies the third visitor, Hajj Mustafa Elmnini, as a representative of Al-Zahraa Halal Meat with experience in halal meat. [Rizvi’s signed accounts]() · [HMO certificate J-333]() · [Corporations Canada’s HMO record]().Shaykh Omar Subedar and Hafiz Faizan Ul-Haq · HMASubedar, HMA’s chief operating officer, memorized the Qur’an in 1993 and completed a seven-year Islamic studies program in Dewsbury, England, in 2001. His studies included Hanafi law and comparison of the four Sunni schools. The World Halal Council lists Ul-Haq as HMA’s chairman. The Canadian Council of Imams identifies him as a Darul Uloom Karachi graduate and resident scholar at Mississauga’s West End Masjid. HMA appears here because its poultry standard requires a hand cut for every bird. [Bukhari Academy biography]() · [World Halal Council’s HMA listing]() · [Canadian Council of Imams’ Fiqh Majlis]() · [HMA poultry rules]().
### Early Muslim scholars behind the rules about slaughter
Abu Hanifa and Malik ibn AnasAbu Hanifa (died 767) was a jurist in Kufa, Iraq. His students preserved the teachings from which the Hanafi school developed. Malik ibn Anas (died 795) taught in Medina. His collection *al-Muwatta* brought together prophetic reports and legal practice. The Maliki school takes its name from him. [Encyclopaedia Iranica on the Hanafi school]() · [Palomar College’s history of the early schools]().Muhammad ibn Idris al-Shafi‘i and Ahmad ibn HanbalAl-Shafi‘i (died 820) studied with Malik and explained how jurists could reason from the Qur’an and reports of the Prophet’s words and actions. Ahmad ibn Hanbal (780-855) collected reports of the Prophet’s words and actions in his *Musnad*. The Shafi‘i and Hanbali schools bear their names. [Palomar College’s history of the early schools]() · [British Library manuscript record]().Ibn Rushd and Ibn QudamahIbn Rushd (1126-1198), the Andalusian judge known as “the grandson,” compared the reasons jurists gave for different rulings in *The Distinguished Jurist’s Primer*. Ibn Qudamah (died 1223) studied in Baghdad and taught in Damascus. His *al-Mughni* discusses differing legal opinions from a Hanbali perspective. Both works help explain disagreement about omitting God’s name at slaughter. [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]() · [TDV’s Ibn Qudamah biography (Turkish)]() · [NYU’s digital edition of al-Mughni]().Anas ibn MalikAnas was a companion of the Prophet Muhammad. The report cited in this article describes what he saw the Prophet do and say when slaughtering two rams. Malik ibn Anas, the jurist above, lived in a later generation. [Anas ibn Malik’s narrator record]() · [Sahih al-Bukhari 5565]().
[Compare the dated rulings]() · [Read the sources for these biographies]().
## Why have scholars reached different conclusions about Maple Lodge?
Picture the moment one worker goes on break. The blade keeps turning and a colleague takes over the recitation. A shopper might ask whether the words stopped. Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi asked another question at Maple Lodge in 2014. Had the relief worker helped start the machine? For Mufti Faisal al-Mahmudi, even starting it together leaves another question. What human action initiates the cut on the *next* bird? Their answers concern different tests of who performs the slaughter. [Rizvi’s signed account]() · [Al-Mahmudi’s signed analysis]().
| Date and authority | What the document establishes |
| --- | --- |
| December 1994 · Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani | At Maple Lodge, he observed recitation that did not coincide with each cut. He rejected the arrangement he saw and proposed three Muslims taking turns to cut the birds by hand. [Account published in 1999, “Machine Slaughtering of Chickens”](). |
| July 1997 · IIFA | Preferred hand slaughter but permitted mechanical poultry slaughter and one live invocation for an uninterrupted group, repeated after a stop. A recording cannot substitute. It rejected electrical poultry stunning on the evidence then before it and allowed meat following a specified gas mixture if the animal survived to lawful slaughter. [Resolution 95](). |
| 2005 · Egypt’s Dar al-Ifta | Ali Gomaa applied a Shafi‘i view and one Hanbali opinion to a Polish question. An eligible person may operate a cutting machine. An electrical stun must leave the animal capable of recovering if left unslaughtered. [Arabic ruling]() · [English version](). |
| 2013 · Darul Iftaa Canada and IIFA | Al-Mahmudi advised avoiding Maple Lodge pending clarity, expressly relying on published descriptions. Separately, IIFA reaffirmed Resolution 95 and commissioned field work into electrical stunning. [September opinion]() · [November Resolution 201](). |
| 2014-18 · Rizvi | After finding the relief-worker problem in 2014, he proposed a joint start. In November 2018 he endorsed HMO’s account that the change had been made. HMO allowed 100 days for older inventory. The endorsement covered production from October 1, 2018. [Signed November statement](). |
| February 2023 · Rizvi | After another personal visit with HMO’s Sayed Alaaeddin Abulhassan and Hajj Mustafa Elmnini, he reported random checks and discussions with Muslim supervisors, and affirmed the line under Sistani’s rulings. [Signed February 6 update](). |
| June 2023 · Al-Mahmudi, checked by Mirza-Zain Baig | Reviewing CHFCA’s and Maple Lodge’s descriptions, he distinguished multiple birds cut simultaneously by one action from successive cuts by a continuously turning blade. His May 2025 clarification said the authors endorsed no current machine-slaughtered brand. [Ruling and clarification](). |
| November 2025 · IIFA | The May Doha session deferred a new ruling on stunning pending more research. Its November 20 publication issued neither a new blanket permission nor a prohibition. [Resolution 263](). |
| August 2026 · Darul Iftaa Chicago | Muftis Ameen Shariff and Abrar Mirza advised asking whether poultry in Egypt was hand- or machine-slaughtered. This newer Hanafi guidance did not assess Maple Lodge. [August 20 ruling](). |
Saudi Arabia’s Permanent Committee separately allowed one invocation by an eligible operator intending to slaughter several birds together. Its ruling required a separate invocation for each hand-slaughtered bird. The OIC’s international academy considered the distinct question of uninterrupted operation. Neither body inspected Maple Lodge in these documents. The brand also names Dr. Mohammad Iqbal Alnadvi and the Fiqh Council of North America as endorsers. A dated ruling from them identifying the plant and procedure would let readers compare that claim with Rizvi’s account. [Saudi committee, fatwa 21165, vol. 22, pp. 463-64]() · [IIFA]() · [Brand FAQ]().
## When qualified scholars disagree, whose ruling should I follow?
The Qur’an directs believers to refer disputes back to God and His Messenger. Scholars can take that duty seriously and still read the same evidence differently. In a report in the Sunni collection *Sahih al-Bukhari*, the Prophet describes a judge who does his best to reach the right decision. He receives two rewards if he is right and one for his effort if he is mistaken. The report gives a reason to respect honest legal reasoning even when one believes another conclusion is correct. [Qur’an 4:59]() · [Bukhari 7352]().
### How does a shopper choose whom to ask?
**One Sunni approach.** Egypt’s Dar al-Ifta says someone without the training to derive a ruling may rely on a qualified jurist from a recognized school. It draws on Qur’an 16:43, which directs people unfamiliar with earlier messengers to ask those who know. Dar al-Ifta also records a view among Sunni jurists that, if you have already received conflicting answers, you should give weight to the scholar whose learning you have better reason to trust. [Qur’an 16:43]() · [Egyptian fatwa 5974 (Arabic)]() · [Dar al-Ifta’s English guide]().
**For a Twelver Shi‘a Muslim following Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani,** the starting point is the qualified jurist recognized as most learned in deriving Islamic law. Where that jurist has given a ruling, his follower acts on it. If he expressly calls for *obligatory precaution*, the follower may observe it or consult the next most learned qualified jurist on that question. A *recommended precaution* is optional. Those terms have precise meanings in his manual. [Sistani’s *Islamic Laws*, rulings 1-7]().
**How to treat someone who decides differently.** In an Omani television interview, the Ibadi scholar Ahmad al-Khalili distinguished asking a second scholar to understand a genuine difference from going from one to another simply to collect the easiest answers. He also said a person who relies on a scholar qualified to assess the evidence on a disputed point of practice should be spared reproach. [Al-Khalili’s interview, printed pp. 38-39 (Arabic)]().
### What does that mean for Maple Lodge?
**If you follow Mufti Faisal al-Mahmudi’s ruling,** the decisive question is who performs each successive cut. He concluded that live recitation alongside the continuously turning blade described to him did not supply the human act his ruling requires for each bird. Zabiha Halal identifies its cutting method as mechanical. Someone following that ruling has a reason to pass on this chicken and look for a verified hand-cut alternative. [Al-Mahmudi’s analysis and 2025 clarification]() · [Zabiha Halal’s FAQ]().
**If you follow Sistani’s rulings,** Sayyid Muhammad Rizvi offers evidence about this particular line. He accepted HMO’s account that the main and relief workers started the machine together. After a return visit and spot checks, he wrote on February 6, 2023 that he regarded the Zabiha Halal products as halal under Sistani’s rulings. A shopper who accepts that evidence under those rulings may eat the chicken. If a change of plant or procedure matters to your decision today, ask the certifier whether the same arrangement covers the product in your hand. [Rizvi’s signed statements]() · [Sistani’s answers on what a buyer may rely on]().
**At a shared meal,** a guest can ask, “Is the chicken hand-cut? That’s the ruling I follow.” A host can identify the brand or offer another dish. A Sunni hadith commends leaving something genuinely doubtful to protect one’s faith. That gives someone who remains unsure a reason to decline for themselves, while leaving room for a relative who has followed qualified advice to eat. [Bukhari 52]() · [Evidence for this section]().
## What does the Arabic on the green box promise?
[]()
**The chicken nuggets box.** The full name of CHFCA appears around the seal on this box from a record listing a Calgary purchase. Uploaded June 7, 2024 by anonymous-s7co2zv64u. Resized and converted to WebP. [Open Food Facts]() · [CC BY-SA 3.0]().
[]()
**The chicken bologna wrapper.** The 375 g wrapper bears Canadian inspection mark 285 beside the barcode. CFIA identifies 285 as the Brampton establishment. The original photo can be enlarged to read it. Contributed by kiliweb in December 2019. Resized and converted to WebP. [Open Food Facts]() · [CC BY-SA 3.0]().
These dated photographs show what shoppers could read on two actual packs. Neither identifies a 2026 lot or establishes the procedure at the moment of slaughter.
On the front of the brand’s pictured chicken strips box, Arabic calligraphy sits above the words Zabiha Halal inside a pointed arch. The earlier Canadian design registration includes a stylized bird and classifies the imagery under mosques and minarets. For that design, the applicant translated the Arabic inscription as “premium quality Zabiha Halal product” and the brand name as “meat slaughtered according to Islamic rules”. A newer registered design gives “High Quality Halal Products” for the inscription. Neither filing specifies who holds the knife or how often the invocation is repeated. [See the box]() · [Earlier CIPO design]() · [Newer CIPO design]().
A buyer who uses *zabiha* to mean hand slaughter might reasonably come away expecting it. The pack image establishes what that face of one box shows. It cannot tell us how many shoppers read it that way. The brand publicly describes automation. A plain-language method statement beside the mark would let the shopper answer the question in the aisle. [Manufacturer’s pack image]() · [Published slaughter method]().
## Is hand-cut or machine-cut chicken halal in Muslim-majority countries?
Hand-cut chicken can be halal wherever the other requirements for slaughter are met. The disagreement is over the knife on a moving line. In Brunei, the national standard requires a person to make the cut. In Türkiye, the religious council accepts a rotating blade under conditions. In Iraq, Ayatollah al-Sistani’s office accepts certain machine cuts and calls for the responsible Muslim to keep invoking God as birds pass the blade. [Compare that ruling with other Shi‘a and Sunni views]().
A fatwa answers a religious question. A slaughterhouse rule governs what workers may do in a particular place. An import rule governs what may cross the border. Indonesia has different texts for the first two questions. Qatar and Kuwait spell out the third. None of these documents certifies a Canadian brand.
| Country and authority | Can a machine make the halal cut? |
| --- | --- |
| BruneiNational halal food standard | **Hand cut required.** PBD 24:2007 rules out mechanical slaughter and calls for God’s name immediately before each animal. In 2025 Brunei told the WTO that imported halal meat must meet its standard and guidelines. [Brunei standard, §3.2.5, p. 12 (mirror)]() · [Brunei’s WTO reply, question 31](). |
| PakistanKarachi seminary ruling | **A conveyor is acceptable. A machine-made cut is rejected.** The Banuri Town seminary says workers may stand along a moving line, invoke God for each bird and cut it by hand. In its 2025 ruling it rejects a continuously powered blade even if a Muslim says God’s name at startup. This is the seminary’s religious judgment. [Banuri Town ruling, 2025 (Urdu)]() · [Banuri Town’s conveyor example (Urdu)](). |
| IndonesiaDomestic slaughterhouses and halal certification | **The answer depends on which rule you are reading.** Article 59 of the Agriculture Ministry’s animal-welfare regulation directs domestic poultry slaughterhouses to cut birds by hand, one at a time. Separately, the halal agency’s 2026 certification guidance sets conditions for a machine cut, including a qualified Muslim operator who invokes God at startup and restart. The Indonesian Ulema Council also permits that method under conditions. A halal certificate alone cannot settle whether a domestic plant met its animal-welfare obligations. [Agriculture regulation 32/2025, art. 59(7)(a)]() · [Read article 59 in Indonesian (CRPG copy)]() · [BPJPH decision 160/2026, ch. III.F]() · [Indonesian Ulema Council fatwa 35/2021, p. 6](). |
| MalaysiaReligious ruling and plant approval | **The national fatwa committee allowed a mechanical knife under conditions.** In its 2000 decision, the Muslim operator says God’s name before switching on the blade and stays to watch the slaughter. JAKIM’s amended certification manual requires intention and invocation at slaughter. A foreign plant seeking approval must also undergo a separate assessment. [Malaysian fatwa committee’s decision (Malay)]() · [JAKIM’s amended manual, pp. 47-49]() · [Malaysia’s foreign-plant approval system](